Employee Relations: April 2009 Archives

Do you have someone in your organization who constantly is displaying a "woe is me" or "I don't like this" attitude?  Perhaps you have a perennial malcontent on your hands.

Do you have someone who likes to stir up everyone, for no other purpose than to draw attention to themself?  You have a pretend activist on your hands.


Dealing with these two types of personalities can be delicate, time consuming, and draining.  However, following some sound principles can prevent either of these characters from becoming more of a problem than they should.

By following solid coaching and counseling procedures, you can keep track of someone's concerns and issues.  Identifying patterns can be much easier if you keep track of what the perennial malcontent's concerns are, and whether they are signs of an organizational ill or just someone complaining for the sake of doing so.

Likewise, when there appears to be someone who is raising a stink just for the sake of doing so, channel that persone effectively by using their talents and skills to your advantage.  If you find that the pretend activist actually has the ear of their peers, you may want to use them to spread "actual" news vs the gossip that they usually share.


Share your stories of Perennial Malcontents and Pretend Activists by emailing me at

robert@galaconcierge.com

 

 

 

 

 

Q: To what extent do corporations use behaviorial studies to hire individuals? Do human resource departments do studies on individuals behaviors of any nature or do any psychological testing?

A:  I've been a part of a number of psychological tests or personality tests during hiring processes.  Each of these tests were designed to be a supplement to the hiring process, not necessarily a vetting tool.  When used responsibly, these tests are used to determine the motivating factors behind people's work ethic, character traits to determine what a person is like, and to sometimes weed out a negative or combative personality.

Some of the concerns I have heard from people on these tests are that they are so easy to rig because it's pretty clear what the answer is.  I also have heard that it can be a tricky method to make sure that you answer the same way consistently.  

On the positive side, I've seen people say it is a good way to determine if people are following sound ethics, if they are combative in the workplace, and to ensure consistency.  As well, they can be used to match up complimentary personality types.

One of my favorite personality tests is the DISC model.  A series of questions are used to determine what your major personality style is, followed by any backup styles you may use from time to time.  To date, this is the most valid model I have seen used in the workplace.

Today I will share with you a few of the comments I've received from readers on their experiences in the hiring process.  

1.  "One of the worst things a company can do is stop communicating.
I had gone through four official phone interviews up to and including Sr.
Dept VP's. 

Everyone was incredibly prompt and professional with their interviewing and
the conversations were very positive.

Then, nothing. No phone calls, no follow up emails. Just nothing.

After a week of no follow up via email or phone I contacted the HR person
and was told (via email) that there was a hiring freeze and I could contact
them after the beginning of the year.

It was a terrible experience and I will never buy their product again nor
suggest it. I used to enjoy it very much when I had the cash."

2.  " I worked for a company for 3 years as a temporary employee.  I passed an examination and accepted a permanent position with a different department in the same company. During this time I took the examination for my previous position and passed.  

There was one position open and about 5 people interviewed for the position, including myself.  When I went in for the interview they did not ask me anything regarding the position, just conversation (they already knew me).  They told me they weren't sure if I would get the position, they had two more interviews and would get back to me.  

I didn't hear anything for a week so I called and I called and I called; no answer to whether the position was filled or not.  I ended up hearing from someone I used to work with that they hired someone else.  Not only did they not let me know that when I called, they never even sent me a letter. 

I felt that this was rude, especially since they knew me, liked me, and wanted me to interview again if I didn't get the position.  I wasn't mad that I didn't get the position but I was upset they never let me know that they filled the position.

A couple months later I was called for two interviews; one with my old unit and one with another unit (same department).  I went on my old unit's interview on Monday and the other unit on Friday.  The other unit called me three hours after my interview to offer me the job.  It took my old unit a week to call me back.  I ended up taking the other unit's offer since they called me back first and because I didn't like how my old unit treated me."
I am often asked questions along the lines of

"How do I make this person work harder?"
"How do I keep this person from coming in late all the time?"
"XXXXX hasn't done anything productive for the last XXXX months, what can I do?"

These questions (with some flexibility based on union contracts, labor agreements, company policies) can all be solved with an effective "3-D Policy" - Document, Discipline, Dismiss.
(McGrath mentions the 3D Policy in their article "Document, Discipline, Dismiss: The McGrath 3-D Approach to Documentation of Employee Performance and Misconduct
Issues
.")

Not everything documented has to be of a negative nature.  But documenting as much as possible about someone's performance helps you cover yourself in the event of a complaint.

I've been blessed to only have had to fire a few people in my lifetime, and all of them were a result of following an effective Document Discipline Dismiss policy?

How have you effectively used 3D or a variation of it?  Let me know at robert@galaconcierge.com
Manners, Positivity, Heroics was a book I wrote in 2005 about a methodology called Manners, Positivity, Heroics.  When practiced, these three traits can lead to a very productive and vibrant workplace.

Manners - As I've explained in a prior entry on how to politely handle turning down a job and how to handle turning down applicants, manners and etiquette are lost arts in many places.  Going over the top with kindness never hurts.  As my grandmother used to say "you get a lot more with honey than vinegar.

Positivity - Both as an applicant and as an employer, displaying a positive attitude at all times despite what may be going on inside makes a world of difference.  The time for the frown is behind closed doors.  As my friend Christy used to tell me, "smile more, it works".

Heroics - Doing little things to make a difference that are often sight unseen can turn an applicant or an employee into a motivated machine. 

Over the next few weeks, I'll be sprinkling in stories of "MPH" that I have seen and experienced in the workplace.  Likewise, I'll look forward to hearing some of your stories.

Email me your "MPH" moments privately at @ robert@galaconcierge.com, or post a comment below.

And if you'd like a copy of my book, they are available at

http://www.lulu.com/rjbraathe

In my entry earlier this week, I spoke about how to turn down an employer politely.  Today, let's look at the flip side; how to turn down candidates who you aren't going to select or have continue on in the recruiting process.


I've seen some good practices over the years.  Some companies will get the process right in the beginning; others neglect to have any dialogue and leave people hanging.

APPLICATION

Starting with the initial contact from an employee, effective companies will have a process in place to indicate in some form something like this-

"Thank you for your application to XXXX.  We will be reviewing resumes for XXXX period, and if we are going to consider you for an interview, we will followup with you by..."

INTERVIEW #1 

In the first interview with a candidate, giving the candidate a realistic guideline of when they can expect to hear from you.  Some ways to politely turn down a candidate at this stage may be

1.  Postcard/letter/email to the candidate to indicate you are going in another direction
2.  Phone call thanking the candidate for considering, but that the position has gone to another candidate

FINALIST CANDIDATES

This level of contact with candidates should reflect an extreme level of professionalism.  When you have invited someone to your place of business, introduced them to members of your staff, and given them a great deal of your time, a bit more diplomacy may be in order.

A phone call that includes suggestions for further opportunities with the company, and taking the time to make suggestions to the candidate on how to improve their chances in the future are nice touches that can create an opportunity to consider a candidate in the future.

BEST AND WORST PRACTICES

What are some best practices you have seen in hiring communication?  The worst?  I'll feature some of these (anonymously) in a future article.





Albany.com :: Your Official Guide To Albany NY & The Capital Region
Full-Service Internet Marketing: Website Design, Development & Optimization by Mannix Marketing, Inc.
Mannix Marketing, Inc. is headquartered near Albany in Glens Falls, New York
For Advertising Information Only: Phone: 518-743-9424 :: Fax: 518-743-0337 :: Advertising Options
All Rights Reserved © 2003-2009, Copyright Mannix Marketing, Inc. Copyright Policies
Albany.com is a privately owned web site and is not affiliated with the City of Albany, Albany County or any other government organization.